Starmer's Fightback Against 'Far-Right' Division

This week, in The Guardian and The Sun, Starmer pledged to ‘fightback and reject the division fuelled by the far-right.’ He also whined about ‘populist leaders stoking division’ by flying the British flag

Populist leaders? So, he’s referring to a person who appeals to the regular man and woman in the street who feels that their concerns are disregarded by government. Well, our concerns are disregarded by government. So, he’s kind of shot himself in the foot there …. again. And, let’s say it out loud, the ‘populist leader’ who exasperates him and makes his blood boil so much is Tommy Robinson.

But back to his issue with the far-right stoking division, which is nothing but a straw man argument, intentionally misrepresenting his own crimes because they’re easier to defend when he blames others. Do you know what? Our viewpoints don’t matter, our tastes are piss poor, the things we take pleasure in are viewed with disdain, our laughter is too raucous, and whenever we get frustrated about something we get called far-right.

You see, Starmer doesn’t use the phrase ‘conspiracy theorist’ (maybe he thinks it’s a bit played out now). Instead, he calls those of us who show concern about uncontrolled immigration, government inaction on knife crime and paedophile rape gangs ‘far-right thugs’

Note: He doesn’t call those committing knife crime ‘thugs,’ he only calls those who live in fear of being stabbed ‘thugs’

Conspiracy theorists? Far-right? Both work to the advantage of those like Starmer who seek to destroy the country because they ‘divide’ the population, something this week in The Guardian and The Sun he’s just accused patriots of doing

And this is what sparked my interest, for Starmer’s a sociopath. Without any shadow of a doubt, unquestionably, no if’s or buts, Starmer is a highly-functioning sociopath, an Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD). And I know about sociopaths because I was attacked by one for years. So, I’ll describe a sociopath, and you tell me if you think this sounds like Starmer:

·       Can initially be very charming (although very arrogant)

·       Pathological liar (catch them in a lie just once and they will be completely unfazed; they will immediately bounce six more lies straight back at you – they’ve been doing this since childhood)  

·       No guilt feelings whatsoever – they’re just not wired that way

·       Complete lack of empathy or compassion – immune to the suffering of others

·       Does not care about people – again, it’s just not in their nature

·       Sees others as impersonal objects to be manipulated without any regard for the hurtful consequences

·       A sociopath can murder a part of your soul and then leave the scene of the crime and blame it on you.

·       Gets their kicks by ruining people. And they do this by causing arguments between husband & wife, or friends. To do this they lie, ‘I saw your husband/wife with that lovely ….. so nice he/she can have such a friend.’ Seriously, they do this all the time and sit back and watch the results. Before you know it, you’re arguing with each other about something the sociopath said three days ago but has been playing on your mind. A marriage must be very, very strong to survive a sociopath’s attacks because they are extremely good at this  

Now take that last point to a much grander scale, say, a national scale. If you have a highly-functioning sociopath at the helm, their main goal is to control the population. Sociopaths are control freaks. They’re addicted to it. And the best way to control people is to divide them into different ideological groups and they’ll soon start fighting each other, forgetting who their true enemy is.

Starmer uses skin colour to disconnect us, religion to separate us and politics to divide us. And then gaslights us by accusing the so-called ‘far-right’ of stoking division. This is a sociopath’s method of operation. They accuse YOU of what THEY are guilty of. They’ll steal the milk from the doorstep and then, before anyone realises it’s missing, accuse you of taking it. You’ve no idea what they’re talking about, of course. But when people notice the milk is missing everyone’s looking sideways at YOU!

Catch them with a smoking gun and they’ll swear under oath that you killed the man, acting extremely hurt and outraged that you could suggest they did the dastardly deed.

Over the years I got to recognise the pattern. I’d suddenly be accused of something – privately, or with others present, or by email – something I had absolutely no knowledge of, and whereas at first I was taken aback, proclaiming my innocence, I eventually got to notice what was really going on, and would think, ‘That’s interesting, that’s something else you’ve done, something else you’re guilty of.’

I was once accused of stealing £12,000, and I immediately realised ‘Interesting, she’s stolen £12,000. I’ll have to do a little digging here.’ Sociopaths, you see, have a weakness for boasting about their crimes. They can’t resist it. So, they do this by accusing others.

And this is what I immediately understand about Starmer accusing the mythical far-right of stoking up division …. simply by waving a flag, for God’s sake.

1)       He’s boasting about his own success in dividing the nation, 2) he’s accusing others of his own crime in dividing the nation, and 3) HE HIMSELF is stoking up more division in the country by accusing patriots of stoking division, when in reality Operation Raise the Colours is bringing the country together like nothing we’ve seen in decades. Nobody’s getting stabbed, no one’s attacking police officers, no women are assaulted, and no kids are nonced. It’s a good thing, a great thing. And Starmer hates it, so he has to try and gaslight the nation by accusing those waving a flag of being ‘far-right’ and trying to divide people, when in fact just the opposite is true.

Remember, the king will never have to fight the peasants if he can convince the pitchfork people that the torch people want to steal their pitchforks.     

So next time you hear Starmer accuse a patriot of being ‘far-right’ remember that it’s just a pseudo-phrase, a unit of speech that appears to be an actual phrase but in fact has no meaning whatsoever. And the only reason he uses this nonsense pseudo-phrase is to divide neighbour from neighbour. And then he accuses US of stoking division!

But as I said, he doesn’t call those having machete fights in the street far-left thugs. No, not at all, they’re anti-racist activists. They’re not troublemakers, they just get up to a little mischief now and again, and they only desecrate war memorials to raise awareness. They’re not wannabe Bolsheviks, they’re peaceful protesters. One can understand their grievances. Good blokes all of them

But no matter what Starmer or Sadiq Khan, for that matter says, British Working-Class Lives (of every colour) DO Matter. And we’re not trying to divide the nation. Just the opposite in fact.